POPHAM BEACH PILING REMOVAL: The Politics of Beach Erosion

Popham pilings

So, about that arrogant CEO I mentioned in my last post: this would be Jackson Parker, who runs a heavy construction company called Reed & Reed, based in Woolwich, Maine. About five years ago Mr. Parker built himself a McMansion on Popham Beach–he calls it a “cottage,” in the best tradition of the old Newport elite down in Rhode Island–just down the beach from a small house owned by my aunt. WaveTrain riders with long memories may recall this is the house where my mom died over seven years ago.

Since buying his property and building his cottage Mr. Parker has decided he does not like a collection of old steamboat pier pilings (see photo up top) that jut up out of the water just off the beach, almost directly in front of my aunt’s house and just a short distance down from his. He may not like the look of them, or he may (as some contend) want to build a dock of his own, or, most likely I think, he may, as he claims he does, sincerely believe the pilings are causing the beach to erode.

So Mr. Parker has applied for and unfortunately has received a permit to remove the pilings, which are located on public property, in spite of the fact there is little or no evidence to support his erosion claim, and in spite of the fact that everyone else in town wants them to stay. This has made him the central figure in a local controversy that has recently invaded the pages of such large and distant newspapers as the Boston Globe.

Parker cottage

The humble abode of Mr. Parker. It is the fanciest house on a beach that, unlike the rest of the Maine coast, has seen very little over-the-top summer-home building. This photo was taken from the public beach in front of the house, a prospect Mr. Parker evidently finds threatening

Pilings scenic

The pilings, a much more scenic view. Photo by David Spencer

Jackson Parker

Mr. Parker, himself, per the Reed & Reed website

It is telling that in the original application for his piling removal permit, the appended report by Parker’s own hired experts, Ransom Consulting, noted that the amount of sand in this area of the beach had actually been increasing and that the beach there has historically been stable. But what is alarming is the more objective opinion offered by Dr. Stephen Dickson of the Maine Geological Survey, to the effect that it is impossible to say whether removing the pilings will help build up the beach and, more importantly, that their removal may in fact harm the beach and nearby buildings.

Everybody in Popham has been talking about how historic the pilings are, and it is true, they are. But Popham is littered with pilings west of Hunnewell Point (see the chartlet in my previous post) that can just as easily remind us of the days more than 100 years ago when steamships regularly arrived from Boston bearing hundreds of hotel guests. And yes, the pilings are very scenic and are indeed iconic in the minds of those who frequent the beach. But what I really worry about is the very destructive process of removing the pilings with a barge, a clamshell bucket, and a vibratory extractor, which is what Parker proposes.

aerial 1

Aerial view of pilings. What Parker wants to do, near as I can tell, is dig a huge hole here. To me it seems likely the immediate effect will be negative. Perhaps severely so. Significantly, Parker’s house cannot be seen in this photo

aerial 2

Another aerial view, courtesy of John Briggs. Note again Parker’s house is not close enough to the pilings to appear here. That’s my aunt’s house directly behind the pilings. There is a small vacant parcel, which once belonged to the steamship company that built the dock and now has no known owner, between her property and Parker’s, which is out of view below


The pilings when they were a pier, over 100 years ago. In those days there were huge hotels on the beach and steamboats brought guests up from Boston every weekend in season. The hotels are long gone, but they are not forgotten

I can guess what has happened here. Mr. Parker has been watching the beach in front of his house for five whole years now and has seen it change. It is a beach after all; it cannot help but do that. I’ve been watching the beach my entire life, well over 50 years, and I am familiar with its patterns. The beach further south is incredibly dynamic, with wild gyrations of sand and water that have cost some people their houses and the state part of a parking lot (I described one dramatic variation in that post about my mom). But the beach behind the pilings has indeed been very stable: sometimes its angle gets steeper (which seems to be what’s happening now) and sometimes it gets shallower, but the dune line behind the sand has remained mostly unchanged.

Mr. Parker heads up a big successful heavy construction firm. He sees what he figures must be a problem on what he considers to be his beach, ponders the hammer he holds in his hand, and reckons this problem must be a nail. Time to use the hammer!

Parker and his firm, I am sure, have applied for many permits over the years and are well known to the people who issue them. Little wonder then that Parker should have little trouble obtaining this one, pertaining to such a seemingly trivial matter. But I suspect he has been taken aback by the very negative public reaction, and by the publicity, and is now feeling defensive.

At least he seemed that way to me when he sprang out of his house like a jack-in-the-box to confront me when he saw me on the beach last week taking photos of the pilings and the houses behind them. We had a rather circular conversation about the pilings and whether I was invading his privacy. At the end of it I asked him if he stood ready to compensate people if his removal project damaged their property, and he proudly answered no.

The next day, having stalked me online, Parker sent a note to the publisher of SAIL, accusing me of being a stalker, and suggesting I should be fired.

The good news is the permit approval has been appealed. The town is making all the obvious arguments: Parker has no legal interest in or right to the pilings (which in fact belong to the state); his erosion evidence is very thin; the project may harm other people’s property; everyone likes the pilings, for both historic and aesthetic reasons. Etc.

Hopefully the appropriate governmental persons will rethink their position and do the right thing. Hopefully Mr. Parker will calm down a bit. Hopefully the folks at Reed & Reed, or whoever is slated to perform the removal, will ponder the liability they may incur if things go wrong. Hopefully I won’t get fired. Hopefully the pilings will remain and will be allowed to wear away, bit by bit, as I have watched them do my entire life, just like my mother before me.

Related Posts

13 Responses
  1. Egidijus

    Removal of pilings will likely lead to diminishing beach. Same shit happened in Palanga (Lithuania, Baltic sea) when somebody in the city council decided to have a tender to remove all stones around the Palanga Pier that were put here 100 years ago. As a result, sea started to erode the beach and now Palanga council has to bring sand to the beach (!) each year as it is a most popular summer vacation destination. But the stones were so ugly, you know…

  2. Clare

    Very good (and measured) piece. I like how the pilings look and find it hard to see how their existence might be contributing to beach erosion. Clare

  3. Philippe Agostini

    From my experience of a 150 year old erosion issue in front of our property in Trinidad in the Caribbean, anything that slows down the flow of water, be it waves or along shore current, helps to preserve or build up the beach. I’m with you.

  4. Jim Spear

    This would seem funny to some, a wealthy family builds a larger, Newport style home in a once family style neighborhood that was a summer place for long time families. But it’s not funny. My family has seen the changes it Popham over the last 10 years. People with cash twisting the arm of the state and getting what they want, or don’t want. It’s sad and flies in the face of a great slice of Maine. This man should be happy with what he has, leave the rest the history the place the wonder of Popham to the rest, while they can still afford to be there. This is a sad overreaching by someone who needs to learn to be a community member and neighbor.

  5. El Cuz

    I also never believed his interest was to build a landing but I also don’t believe he is concerned about erosion. To build his “Cottage” he had to argue that it would be safe from just that type of danger for at least a hundred years. I am sure he also had plenty of supporting paper signed by people with degrees. My current theory is that he is a bit of an obsessive compulsive and simply does not like them aesthetically. I have seen him out on the beach shoveling seaweed back into the drink with the same pointless ferocity he is attacking the pilings with.
    What I find alarming is the ease in which he got the approval for this and the lack of transparency to the local community until it was a done deal. I hold the State DEP in particular contempt. Their obscene disregard for any contrary argument and their insipid condescending manner in doing so makes it obvious that they have no interest in performing what they are tasked, named and paid to do. By “Them” I am referring to their one specific agent Christine Woodruff who was in charge verifying the bonafides and approved Mr Parker’s application while denying even consideration in some cases of potential health and safety issues. She seemed to know a lot of personal information about him that was not included in his application. No one else from the DEP seemed to be involved at all in this making me wonder about any ethical oversight.
    Though the interest of the press has been an amazing and really the best chance for us to see a positive outcome, they have one crucial thing wrong in their reporting. There is no controversy or debate about these pilings. It is the will of one exceptionally privileged man against everyone else.

  6. Charlie

    @El Cuz: Yes, I gather Christine Woodruff refused to meet with the town selectmen and got a big pat on the back from Parker for doing so. The ease with which he got the permit, in spite of all the excellent arguments if favor of denying it, is a worry.

  7. El Cuz

    @Charlie, Do you think contacting the main office in Augusta where I’d imagine they’d have to sign off on anything put forward by Christine Woodruff would be of any benefit? (other than poetic irony of Mr Parker’s similar attack on your career)

  8. Jenn

    Phippsburg is a very tightly knit community. He would benefit from playing nice with the townfolk, all wonderful hardworking and honest people. They in return expect the same qualities when outsiders move into their town. They are not easily impressed by a pocketful of money. If u r honest and decent these people will give you the shirt off their back. Do the right thing for the community Mr. Reed… You will be glad you did.

  9. John

    There’s a reason people use Snow Fences by farm fields in these parts. It causes snow movement to slow down. Drifts across roads minimized. Those pilings perform the same job. That beach sand will move, unencumbered. You point about him paying if properties affected was indeed a great point.

  10. Laurie DOBSON

    It is a seaside hedgerow. Look at the inrensive network of hedge rows in the blueberry field in Cherryfield. Leonardo di Caprio is building up sand by adding pilings in the water in his seaside villa project to combat erosion.

  11. scott caddell master 100

    Holy Jeez! Why not give the guy a chance to explain what he’s gonna do before you shoot it down, it might even benefit the community! Closed minded if you ask me..

  12. Phippsburg First

    For three generations my family has spent much of our summers, springs and falls at our cottage at Popham Beach. It was built by my grandfather in the late 50s. My great grandmother perished when her cottage burned years before, out in front of the present building. I have always liked those old pilings and like to share the history that they represent with visitors to our Beach- the Boston ferries, the grand hotels and world class ball room of old. What hubris to erect an opulent, and rarely used temple to one’s wealth, then to dismantle the heart of the place it resides. Shame on you Jack Parker.

  13. Ronald Humphrey

    I’ve been going to Popham since 1972. I was 10 years old my best friends parents owned a house on Rt 209 1st house on left as you pass silver lake heading towards the bay I’ve watched the pilings deteriorate naturally over the years and have many pictures of them over the years with my kids to bad none with my grandchildren unfortunately. When I heard about Mr. Parker doing this (removing them ) I couldn’t believe it. It’s 2021 now and I still can’t believe they are not there I can’t believe the state let him do that. The guy should be run out of town !!!!! What’s next the fort????? Cause he doesn’t like that view as he comes down the street as he makes the turn onto his street. Horrible!!!!! What about the pilings in Atkins bay !!!!! Do you like them Mr. Parker ?????

Leave a Reply



Please enable the javascript to submit this form

Facebook Pagelike Widget


Google Ads